On 12-09-19 07:13, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
What is so evil about new airports and
bridges and working together on infrastructure for the American
people?
Nothing at all. That is one of the things that Trump promised. How did that go? Either now, or when he controlled both houses of Congress?
Has he or the Republican introduced any such bills? I really don't know and would like to find out if they did and if so, what happened to them.
The problem is obstruction with the Democratic Party remember Nancy
and Chuck, Nancy looking smug, and motionless. Chuck acting like crime boss shaking his finger. Show a bit of restraint man; your in the
presence of the President. Not Chuck's fault really as he just got with
a all nighter binge watching the DVD set of "The Sopranos."
The problem is obstruction with the Democratic Party remember Nancy and Chuck, Nancy looking smug, and motionless. Chuck acting like cri boss shaking his finger. Show a bit of restraint man; your in the presence of the President. Not Chuck's fault really as he just got wi a all nighter binge watching the DVD set of "The Sopranos."
Since you have nothing factual to say, you insult the Democratic participants. They went to the meeting with expectations of having meaningful talks on a plan, but instead got told that Trump would not
work on infrastructure with them until they killed the investigations. Basically, he sandbagged them.
On 12-10-19 07:14, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Infrastructure Mtgs <=-
Read the transcript for your self.
https://tinyurl.com/y3phva3c
By the way that bit about Biden (within the transcript) The President
is duty bound by the Constitution to investigate corruption where ever
it may be.
It's beyond high time that the DEMS read that document too.
Who sandbagged who? Would you work with someone trying to stab you in
the back or trying to remove you? I know I wouldn't.
. ______ ���������Ŀ ��������Ŀ �����������������Ŀ
_[]_���ij� � Fidonet � �FSX Net� � Another Message �
{ NET 267 � �1:267/150� �21:1/127� � by Gregory �
/ 00����00'-����00���00�٨���00��00�٨�����00�������00����
-!- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Windows/64)
! Origin: Capital Station BBS * telnet://csbbs.dyndns.org *
(1:267/150)
Then he should have been asking for investigation against all
corruption, not just against the claimed corruption which would aid his
On 12-11-19 12:39, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Infrastructure Mtgs <=-
Then he should have been asking for investigation against all
corruption, not just against the claimed corruption which would aid his
How would that question sound?
"Could you please investigate all forms up corruption in your state
except for crimes committed by Hunter Biden? It's real important that
we let him get away with everything he did, or my friend Adam might
injure his eye sockets."
People need to choose if they're for corruption or against it.
On 12-14-19 09:38, Ron Lauzon <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
Trump has denied the role of Congress to be an independent body by refusing to allow anyone in the Whitehouse staff to submit to a Subpoena from Congress. What is he so afraid of? His actions have been
anything but frivolous. They harmed an ally and aided an adversary.
If the House (not "Congress") had the power to make people testify,
they they should do so. It's their circus after all.
But I'll throw this back at you:
Why are the Dems refusing to answer questions about the
Bidens? Why has Hunter
Biden dropped off the face of the Earth?
What are the Dems afraid of?
You must have missed Beto's remarks about seizing everyone weapons.
The Dems have pushed gun control for a long time now and their words
and actions have followed the same course that every other depot has
done to disarm the public.
No one is trying to disarm the public, but it is long past the time when for America to continue doing nothing to diminish mass shootings at
malls, synagogues, and schools. That has got to stop.
No one is trying to disarm the public, but it is long past the time when for America to continue doing nothing to diminish mass shootings at
malls, synagogues, and schools. That has got to stop.
Dale Shipp wrote to Ron Lauzon <=-
Given enough time, they could enforce the lawful subpoenas that Trump
is denying -- but it takes time to push that through the court system.
It is NOT a circus.
Afraid of nothing, and the questions were answered a long time ago.
Just not to Trump's satisfaction.
Actually, he did not say that he would seize everyone's weapons. He
made his statement about assault weapons of mass destruction which have
no real justification to be in individual hands.
No one is trying to disarm the public, but it is long past the time
when for America to continue doing nothing to diminish mass shootings
at malls, synagogues, and schools. That has got to stop.
Gregory Deyss wrote to Dale Shipp <=-
No one is trying to disarm the public, but it is long past the time when for America to continue doing nothing to diminish mass shootings at
malls, synagogues, and schools. That has got to stop.
Maybe in the examples that you have provided if there a a good guy with
a gun these events wouldn't of been a massacre.
Where do you get that? After the farmers lost much, they finally approved 12billion aid -- but that did not come from tariffs, it came from the public coffers at the expense of you and me. The government does not get the money from tariffs, the consumer pays them.
On 12-15-19 21:05, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: More stuff <=-
No one is trying to disarm the public, but it is long past the time when for America to continue doing nothing to diminish mass shootings at
malls, synagogues, and schools. That has got to stop.
I think that was what Obama said about it. "It has to stop." Tough
talk! But nobody is on board with anything that anyone else is on board with.
Congress can step in and help us with this - but they are busy right
now, doing stuff that is actually important to them.
Obama could not pass gun control laws since the Republican Congress
would not even allow anything to be debated.
The problem is that undocumented at people have already shown us how much
they give a crap about our laws;
What can we do to stop our laws from being ignored?
Vote people out that continue to be supportive of sanctuary cities.
Stop the Federal funding to these cities. There will be some that will say
that this can not be done, oh yea watch me.. They whine and wince and cry
and stamp their feet and some will act up and say it is mean and wrong; so
is breaking the law and violating U.S. Sovereignty.
On 12-15-19 21:05, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: More stuff <=-
No one is trying to disarm the public, but it is long past the time w for America to continue doing nothing to diminish mass shootings at malls, synagogues, and schools. That has got to stop.
I think that was what Obama said about it. "It has to stop." Tough talk! But nobody is on board with anything that anyone else is on boa with.
Obama could not pass gun control laws since the Republican Congress
would not even allow anything to be debated.
Obama could not pass gun control laws since the Republican Congress >DS>would not even allow anything to be debated.
It sounds like both parties need to do some serious thinking about who they >elect in the future. Mitch can kiss it if he's the cause of all this. I
don't
live in his district, but if he's playing dictator like you say, then he
will
be out of office soon enough.
Obama could not pass gun control laws since the Republican Congress >DS>would not even allow anything to be debated.
The problem is with the gun control laws. Chicago has the strictest controls
anywhere in the nation, but yet people of color keep killing each with
guns. I doubt that these people are going through normal controls on obtaining a gun. Stop blaming the gun blame the individual and the culture which drives lawlessness.
be out of office soon enough.
Why have term limits? Repeal the 22nd Amendment and let the people
On 12-18-19 06:37, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: More stuff <=-
No one is trying to disarm the public, but it is
long past the time w
for America to continue doing nothing to diminish mass shootings at
malls, synagogues, and schools. That has got to stop.
The problem is with the gun control laws. Chicago has the strictest controls anywhere in the nation, but yet people of color keep killing
each with guns. I doubt that these people are going through normal controls on obtaining a gun. Stop blaming the gun blame the individual
and the culture which drives lawlessness.
measures. The mass shooting have been single persons (mostly white
males) using high capacity weapons. Banning such weapons would help
On 12-20-19 10:19, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: More stuff <=-
measures. The mass shooting have been single persons (mostly white
males) using high capacity weapons. Banning such weapons would help
Is it PC to say *mostly white males*?
Does race even matter? Are the
majority of these mass shootings racially motivated?
The problem is with the gun control laws. Chicago has the strictest controls anywhere in the nation, but yet people of color keep killing each with guns. I doubt that these people are going through normal controls on obtaining a gun. Stop blaming the gun blame the individua and the culture which drives lawlessness.
Stick to the thread which is about mass shootings at malls, synagogues
and schools. Inner city problems are valid, but require different measures. The mass shooting have been single persons (mostly white
males) using high capacity weapons. Banning such weapons would help
curb the carnage of school children, etc.
Given enough time, they could enforce the lawful subpoenas that Trump is DS>denying -- but it takes time to push that through the court system. It DS>is NOT a circus.
But I'll throw this back at you:
Why are the Dems refusing to answer questions about the
Bidens? Why has Hunter
Biden dropped off the face of the Earth?
What are the Dems afraid of?
Afraid of nothing, and the questions were answered a long time ago.
Just not to Trump's satisfaction.
No one is trying to disarm the public, but it is long past the time when for America to continue doing nothing to diminish mass shootings at
malls, synagogues, and schools. That has got to stop.
Maybe in the examples that you have provided if there a a good guy with a GD>gun these events wouldn't of been a massacre.
On 12-15-19 21:05, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: More stuff <=-
No one is trying to disarm the public, but it is long past the time when for America to continue doing nothing to diminish mass shootings at
malls, synagogues, and schools. That has got to stop.
I think that was what Obama said about it. "It has to stop." Tough
talk! But nobody is on board with anything that anyone else is on board with.
Obama could not pass gun control laws since the Republican Congress
would not even allow anything to be debated.
Congress can step in and help us with this - but they are busy right
now, doing stuff that is actually important to them.
One of those things was the House passed a gun control law -- but it is DS>one of more than 400 House passed bills that McConnell stuffed into his DS>desk drawer without even allowing discussion or vote.
On 12-18-19 06:37, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: More stuff <=-
No one is trying to disarm the public, but it is
long past the time w
for America to continue doing nothing to diminish mass shootings at
malls, synagogues, and schools. That has got to stop.
The problem is with the gun control laws. Chicago has the strictest controls anywhere in the nation, but yet people of color keep killing
each with guns. I doubt that these people are going through normal
controls on obtaining a gun. Stop blaming the gun blame the individual
and the culture which drives lawlessness.
Stick to the thread which is about mass shootings at malls, synagogues DS>and schools. Inner city problems are valid, but require different DS>measures. The mass shooting have been single persons (mostly white DS>males) using high capacity weapons. Banning such weapons would help DS>curb the carnage of school children, etc.
measures. The mass shooting have been single persons (mostly white
males) using high capacity weapons. Banning such weapons would help
Is it PC to say *mostly white males*? Does race even matter? Are the AT>majority of these mass shootings racially motivated? How about all that AT>liberal news that follows the shootings: is it racially-motivated too?
Does race even matter? Are the
majority of these mass shootings racially motivated?
Some are, some are not.
be out of office soon enough.
Why have term limits? Repeal the 22nd Amendment and let the people
I don't understand? Do you want Mitch to stick around forever?
I'm in favor of term limits.
I'm sick of my governor, but he's not going anywhere.
Some idiot democrat went off at the mouth about `white' shooter
recently, only to learn it was a *black* shooter and she should have
No one is trying to disarm the public, but it is long past the timewhen
for America to continue doing nothing to diminish mass shootings at malls, synagogues, and schools. That has got to stop.
I think that was what Obama said about it. "It has to stop." Tough
talk! But nobody is on board with anything that anyone else is on board with.
Obama could not pass gun control laws since the Republican Congress DS>would not even allow anything to be debated.
Congress can step in and help us with this - but they are busy right
now, doing stuff that is actually important to them.
One of those things was the House passed a gun control law -- but it is DS>one of more than 400 House passed bills that McConnell stuffed into his DS>desk drawer without even allowing discussion or vote.
If the Constitution was actually followed, and the Second amendment was
viewed for what it actually is: s citizen's right to KEEP and BEAR (as in a`carry at ll times, any where in the US of A) mass shootings would
probably hnot ever appen.
There'd be so many people carrying weapons (openly or concealed) nobody'd have
the nerve to `go off' and start shooting people.
On 12-20-19, DALE SHIPP said to GREGORY DEYSS:
On 12-18-19 06:37, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: More stuff <=-
No one is trying to disarm the public, but it is
long past the time w
for America to continue doing nothing to diminish mass shootings at malls, synagogues, and schools. That has got to stop.
The problem is with the gun control laws. Chicago has the strictest controls anywhere in the nation, but yet people of color keep killing each with guns. I doubt that these people are going through normal controls on obtaining a gun. Stop blaming the gun blame the individual and the culture which drives lawlessness.
Stick to the thread which is about mass shootings at malls, synagogues DS>and schools. Inner city problems are valid, but require different DS>measures. The mass shooting have been single persons (mostly white DS>males) using high capacity weapons. Banning such weapons would help DS>curb the carnage of school children, etc.
Yeah! Right! That way...instead of killing ...say....15 or so *unarmed* people
in a few bursts... they'd be forced to kill 15 or so people one shot at a time!
The democrats like to distract attention from most mass shootings occuring
in
*gun-free zones*!
`*Gun-free zone*: A place or area where noone is allowed to carry, possess, or
have within easy access; a firearm of any kind.
*Gun-free zone* alternate definition: A free-fire zone for any wingnut with
a
firearm and a yen for getting their name on the evening left-wing news.
Also;
a place where murderous pieces of dog-dirt know they can freely open fire
on a
large group of innocent people, without getting themselves pumped full of holes by armed citizens shooting back!
There are no term limits for US Senators. Nor should there be.
There are no term limits for US Representatives. Nor should there be.
There are no term limits for US Senators. Nor should there be.
There are no term limits for US Representatives. Nor should there be.
Imagine if your district had a US Rep who kept fooling people repeatedly; >"I'll fix it once elected.." then "I'll fix it once re-elected.." and they >keep falling for it over and over - while you're irritated and taking notice >of what's going on. Do you get me? I think you see Trump in that way.
The governor of NY isn't in touch with reality.
He gave the green light of illegals to get drivers licenses,
he wants to legalize marijuana,
and he wants to enact a bill that will require mandatory recounts in close
elections.
He's got no to-do list for legitimate NYers.
Losers from the state's GOP tried to run against him, but the entire state
government is democrat, so what are republican voters to do? Move to
Montana? It shouldn't be that way.
Lee Lofaso wrote to TIM RICHARDSON <=-
There were only a small handful of mass shootings that took place
before 1980 or so. Why is that? Because up until that time the courts viewed the Second Amendment as protecting the rights of individuals. Today, the courts have changed their opinion, viewing the Second
Amendment as protecting the rights of gun manufacturers, not people.
As such, it is okay for people to kill as many other people with
guns, with no action ever taken against gun manufacturers as being responsible for having manufactured such weapons of mass destruction.
Lee Lofaso wrote to TIM RICHARDSON <=-
All places of worship should be *gun-free zones*.
All schools (including kindergaten) should be *gun-free zones*.
All hospitals (including insane asylums) should be *gun-free zones*.
Hell, every place where people congregate should be *gun-free zones*.
That is the only way we can all be safe.
Except for our own selves, who have a right to off themselves -
even though doing so remains illegal regardless of method.
Children armed with guns is not a good idea.
Religious worshippers armed with guns is not a good idea.
Doctors armed with syringes, scalpels and poison pills is bad enough. People kill people with guns far more frequently than with any other weapon.
And this is being done by choice, as accessibility to guns
is so easy here in the USA.
There are loopholes that allow certified
nutcases to buy whatever weapon they want without a background check.
Or get one from a friend or relative. Probably at no cost at all.
Lee Lofaso wrote to aaron thomas <=-
Denying people the right to choose who they want to serve is antidemocratic. Why limit their choices by imposing limitations
on who they can vote for? Makes no sense.
Denying people the right to choose who they want to serve is antidemocratic. Why limit their choices by imposing limitations
on who they can vote for? Makes no sense.
Denying people the right to choose who they want to serve is >LL>antidemocratic. Why limit their choices by imposing limitations
on who they can vote for? Makes no sense.
You need to do more research into career politians.
Denying people the right to choose who they want to serve is >LL>antidemocratic. Why limit their choices by imposing limitations
on who they can vote for? Makes no sense.
You need to do more research into career politians.
Denying people the right to choose who they want to serve is >LL>antidemocratic. Why limit their choices by imposing limitations
on who they can vote for? Makes no sense.
Term limits allow for some balance between the left & the right.
With Andrew Cuomo wanting to govern NY for the rest of his life, the
conservatives never have a chance at feeling safe in their homes; no
prospect of ever feeling safe.
If there was a term limit for governor, then the liberals could elect the
next anti-american in line once Cuomo's term-limit is up.
Or, with a little luck, we'd get a good Republican governor instead.
This guy is such a typical democrat that he's abusing his power by signing
far-left bills into law despite the only Republican state senator's pleas
to listen to residents. It seems like he's doing it to be anti-Trump; strictly for popularity points.
Term limits deny the people the opportunity to elect the candidate
of their choice.
Not because Joe Biden or any other candidate was better than her.
to listen to residents. It seems like he's doing it to be anti-Trump; strictly for popularity points.
Well, if that's what the people want, their wish is his command ...
Lee Lofaso wrote to TIM RICHARDSON <=-
There were only a small handful of mass shootings that took place
before 1980 or so. Why is that? Because up until that time the courts viewed the Second Amendment as protecting the rights of individuals.
Today, the courts have changed their opinion, viewing the Second
Amendment as protecting the rights of gun manufacturers, not people.
*LAUGH*
As such, it is okay for people to kill as many other people with
guns, with no action ever taken against gun manufacturers as being responsible for having manufactured such weapons of mass destruction.
Why take action against a manufacturer? The product worked as advertised.
I suppose you are also for charging GM/Ford for every person hurt by a RL>drunk driver or person texting while driving.
| Sysop: | Coz |
|---|---|
| Location: | Anoka, MN |
| Users: | 2 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 157:33:01 |
| Calls: | 162 |
| Files: | 5,334 |
| Messages: | 221,571 |