• Grammar in the Bar

    From Gleb Hlebov@2:5023/24.4222 to All on Wed Mar 13 15:27:52 2024
    Fun stuff which is also ecudative (sort of). :-)

    ==================
    Grammar in the Bar
    ==================

    An Oxford comma walks into a bar, where it spends the evening watching the television, getting drunk, and smoking cigars.

    A dangling participle walks into a bar. Enjoying a cocktail and chatting with the bartender, the evening passes pleasantly.

    A bar was walked into by the passive voice.

    An oxymoron walked into a bar, and the silence was deafening.

    Two quotation marks "walk into" a bar.

    A malapropism walks into a bar, looking for all intensive purposes like a wolf in cheap clothing, muttering epitaphs and casting dispersions on his magnificent other, who takes him for granite.

    Hyperbole totally rips into this insane bar and absolutely destroys everything.

    A non sequitur walks into a bar. In a strong wind, even turkeys can fly.

    Papyrus and Comic Sans walk into a bar. The bartender says, "Get out -- we don't serve your type."

    A mixed metaphor walks into a bar, seeing the handwriting on the wall but hoping to nip it in the bud.

    A comma splice walks into a bar, it has a drink and then leaves.

    Three intransitive verbs walk into a bar. They sit. They converse. They depart.

    A synonym strolls into a tavern.

    At the end of the day, a cliche walks into a bar -- fresh as a daisy, cute as a button, and sharp as a tack.

    A run-on sentence walks into a bar it starts flirting. With a cute little sentence fragment.

    Falling slowly, softly falling, the chiasmus collapses to the bar floor.

    A figure of speech literally walks into a bar and ends up getting figuratively hammered.

    An allusion walks into a bar, despite the fact that alcohol is its Achilles heel.

    The subjunctive would have walked into a bar, had it only known.

    A misplaced modifier walks into a bar owned by a man with a glass eye named Ralph.

    The past, present, and future walked into a bar. It was tense.

    A verb walks into a bar, sees a beautiful noun, and suggests they conjugate. The noun declines.

    A simile walks into a bar, as parched as a desert.

    A gerund and an infinitive walk into a bar, drinking to forget.

    An anacoluthon walks into the bar is open till midnight.

    Into a bar, a hyperbaton walks.

    A subordinate clause that walks into a bar.

    A tautology walks into a bar on foot.

    A zeugma walks into a bar and an argument.

    A synecdoche walks into a well-known pub chain.

    A solecism walk into a bar.

    A metathesis walks into a bra.

    An archaism walketh into an alehouse.

    A periphrasis locomotes bipedally into an establishment licensed to serve alcoholic beverages.

    A group of homophones wok inn two a bar.

    An aposiopesis walks into a -- well, you know the sort of thing.

    A hyphenated word and a non-hyphenated word walk into a bar and the bartender nearly chokes on the irony.

    __________
    Disclaimer

    These jokes were found on Diaspora by Alexandre Oliva in 2020. They had swarmed around the web for several years and probably have numerous authors. The Free Software Foundation claims no copyright on them.


    ... Wed, 13 Mar 2024, 15:27 +0400
    --- End of message. Confused? Me too! :-)
    * Origin: Microstuff, Inc. (2:5023/24.4222)
  • From Alexander Koryagin@2:221/6 to Anton Shepelev on Mon Apr 29 11:00:08 2024

    Hi, Anton Shepelev!
    I read your message from 28.04.2024 19:36


    (142)[Tom] An Oxford comma hops, skips, and jumps into a bar.

    Tom's comma is probably also a yankee's comma. ;-) No comma in Oxford in the list before "and".

    Bye, Anton!
    Alexander Koryagin
    english_tutor 2024

    ---
    * Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
  • From Anton Shepelev@2:221/6 to Alexander Koryagin on Thu May 9 14:32:48 2024
    Alexander Koryagin to Anton Shepelev:

    (142)[Tom] An Oxford comma hops, skips, and jumps into a bar.
    Tom's comma is probably also a yankee's comma. ;-) No
    comma in Oxford in the list before "and".

    No, it is a genuine Oxford comma in mint condition, and I
    use it in both English and Russian. All the items of an
    enumeration shall be separated by commas lest the reader
    mistake the last two items for one combined.

    ---
    * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
  • From Alexander Koryagin@2:221/6 to Anton Shepelev on Fri May 10 22:17:26 2024

    Hi, Anton Shepelev!
    I read your message from 09.05.2024 11:32

    (142)[Tom] An Oxford comma hops, skips, and jumps into a bar.
    Tom's comma is probably also a yankee's comma. ;-) No comma in
    Oxford in the list before "and".

    No, it is a genuine Oxford comma in mint condition, and I use it in
    both English and Russian. All the items of an enumeration shall be separated by commas lest the reader mistake the last two items for
    one combined.

    What do they say in England? They say that in a list "and" is a substitute for a comma.

    Read for instance https://www.sussex.ac.uk/informatics/punctuation/comma/listing
    and find commas before "and".

    Bye, Anton!
    Alexander Koryagin
    english_tutor 2024

    ---
    * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
  • From Gleb Hlebov@2:5023/24.4222 to Alexander Koryagin on Sun May 12 00:05:52 2024
    Hi Alexander!

    On 11.05.24, Alexander Koryagin wrote:

    (142)[Tom] An Oxford comma hops, skips, and jumps into a bar.
    Tom's comma is probably also a yankee's comma. ;-) No comma in
    Oxford in the list before "and".

    No, it is a genuine Oxford comma in mint condition, and I use it in
    both English and Russian. All the items of an enumeration shall be separated by commas lest the reader mistake the last two items for
    one combined.

    What do they say in England? They say that in a list "and" is a substitute for a comma.
    Read for instance https://www.sussex.ac.uk/informatics/punctuation/comma/listing
    and find commas before "and".

    American English punctuation varies slightly from that in the UK -- that's not news to us.
    And you're not expecting American IT folks say "informatics", are you? :-)


    --
    "To iterate is human, to recurse divine." -- L. Peter Deutsch
    --- InterSquish NNTP Server/FTN Gate
    * Origin: www.wfido.ru (2:5023/24.4222)
  • From Alexander Koryagin@2:221/6 to Gleb Hlebov on Mon May 13 12:17:16 2024

    Hi, Gleb Hlebov!
    I read your message from 12.05.2024 03:05

    and find commas before "and".

    American English punctuation varies slightly from that in the
    UK -- ??that's not news to us.
    And you're not expecting American IT folks say "informatics",
    are you? :-)

    Yes, but I was slightly confused when read about "Oxford comma".

    Bye, Gleb!
    Alexander Koryagin
    english_tutor 2024

    ---
    * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
  • From Gleb Hlebov@2:5023/24.4222 to Alexander Koryagin on Mon May 13 16:37:50 2024
    Hi Alexander,

    Mon 13 May 2024 at 12:17, you wrote to me:

    American English punctuation varies slightly from that in the
    UK -- ??that's not news to us.
    And you're not expecting American IT folks say "informatics",
    are you? :-)
    Yes, but I was slightly confused when read about "Oxford comma".

    What's funny is that it is also called "Harvard comma", so yes, it could be a yankee's comma too if you like.

    In a nutshell,
    ======
    Usage of the serial comma varies among writers and editors and also varies among the regional varieties of English. British English allows both the inclusion and omission of this comma, whereas in American English the comma is common and even considered mandatory by several style guides, with the APA style, The Chicago Manual of Style, Garner's Modern American Usage, Strunk and White's The Elements of Style, and the U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual either recommending or requiring it. (../wiki/Serial_comma)
    ======


    ... Look for the ridiculous in everything and you'll find it
    --- A Damned Hobbyist 1.1.5-b20180707
    * Origin: Microstuff, Inc. (2:5023/24.4222)
  • From Dallas Hinton@1:153/7715 to Gleb Hlebov on Thu May 16 13:04:02 2024
    Hi, Gleb -- on May 13 2024 at 16:37, you wrote:

    @REPLY: 2:221/6.0 6641da96
    @MSGID: 2:5023/24.4222 664209a0
    @CHRS: CP866 2
    @TZUTC: 0400
    @TID: hpt/w64-mvcdll 1.9 2024-03-02
    Hi Alexander,

    Mon 13 May 2024 at 12:17, you wrote to me:

    American English punctuation varies slightly from that in the
    UK -- ??that's not news to us.
    And you're not expecting American IT folks say "informatics",
    are you? :-)
    Yes, but I was slightly confused when read about "Oxford comma".

    What's funny is that it is also called "Harvard comma", so yes, it
    could be a yankee's comma too if you like.

    In a nutshell,
    ======
    Usage of the serial comma varies among writers and editors and also
    varies among the regional varieties of English. British English
    allows both the inclusion and omission of this comma, whereas in
    American English the comma is common and even considered mandatory
    by several style guides, with the APA style, The Chicago Manual of
    Style, Garner's Modern American Usage, Strunk and White's The
    Elements of Style, and the U.S. Government Printing Office Style
    Manual either recommending or requiring it. (../wiki/Serial_comma)
    ======


    ... Look for the ridiculous in everything and you'll find it --- A
    Damned Hobbyist 1.1.5-b20180707
    - Origin: Microstuff, Inc. (2:5023/24.4222)
    @EEN-BY: 1/120 18/0 50/109 116/116 123/0 25 126 180 200 755 3001 135/115 @EEN-BY: 138/146 153/757 7715 154/10 221/6 222/2 229/426 240/1120
    250/1 25
    @EEN-BY: 261/38 275/100 1000 301/1 342/11 450/1024 463/68 467/888
    712/1321
    @EEN-BY: 3634/0 12 12 27 56 57 5000/111 5001/100 5005/49 5015/42 46 255 @EEN-BY: 5019/40 5020/570 715 830 846 1042 4441 5022/2 5023/12 24
    5030/49
    @EEN-BY: 5034/13 5053/51 5054/8 5058/104 5060/900 5061/15 133 5075/128 @EEN-BY: 5083/1 444 6035/3
    @ATH: 5023/24 5020/715 1042 3634/12 153/7715



    Cheers... Dallas

    --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: The BandMaster, Vancouver, CANADA (1:153/7715)
  • From Ardith Hinton@1:153/716 to Anton Shepelev on Thu May 16 21:28:24 2024
    Hi, Anton! Recently you wrote in a message to Alexander Koryagin:

    [Tom] An Oxford comma hops, skips, and jumps into a bar.

    Tom's comma is probably also a yankee's comma. ;-) No
    comma in Oxford in the list before "and".

    No, it is a genuine Oxford comma in mint condition, and I
    use it in both English and Russian. All the items of an
    enumeration shall be separated by commas lest the reader
    mistake the last two items for one combined.


    Nicely put. I use the Oxford comma for the same reason.

    I'm interested to hear that one can also employ it in Russian.... :-)




    --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)
  • From Gleb Hlebov@2:5023/24.4222 to Dallas Hinton on Fri May 17 10:23:48 2024
    Hi Dallas,

    Thu 16 May 2024 at 13:04, you wrote to me:

    [...]

    Sounds like a good idea!

    p.s.:
    How are you Dallas? -- or
    How are you, Dallas?

    Comma or none?


    ... Just an amoeba in the Petri dish of life
    --- A Damned Hobbyist 1.1.5-b20180707
    * Origin: Microstuff, Inc. (2:5023/24.4222)
  • From Anton Shepelev@2:221/6 to Ardith Hinton on Fri May 17 13:34:44 2024
    Ardith Hinton:

    I use the Oxford comma for the same reason. I'm
    interested to hear that one can also employ it in
    Russian.... :-

    And who shall stop me, even if I be the first & last person
    on Earth to use the Oxford commad in Russian?

    ---
    * Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
  • From Dallas Hinton@1:153/7715 to Gleb Hlebov on Fri May 17 11:14:34 2024
    Hi, Gleb -- on May 17 2024 at 10:23, you wrote:

    p.s.:
    How are you Dallas? -- or
    How are you, Dallas?

    Comma or none?

    Oh yes, the comma is needed, imo. Otherwise the first example could be read as: How! Are you Dallas?
    :-)

    Cheers... Dallas

    --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: The BandMaster, Vancouver, CANADA (1:153/7715)
  • From Ardith Hinton@1:153/716 to Dallas Hinton on Mon May 20 23:52:14 2024
    Hi, Dallas! Recently you wrote in a message to Gleb Hlebov:

    p.s.:
    How are you Dallas? -- or
    How are you, Dallas?

    Comma or none?

    Oh yes, the comma is needed, imo. Otherwise the first example could
    be read as: How! Are you Dallas?
    :-)

    Or Gleb might be unaware that there are two different people with the same surname posting from different node numbers in +/- the same area.

    From a grammatical standpoint I presume what he needs to know is that in English the comma is used with the vocative... e.g.

    Honey, we need to talk about our relationship.

    I said as much, you twit, the last time you asked.

    I will be yours forever, Gerald (or Geraldine).


    My initial reaction was that he had not expected to hear from you too.... :-))




    --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)
  • From Gleb Hlebov@2:5023/24.4222 to Ardith Hinton on Wed May 22 11:44:14 2024
    Hi Ardith,

    Mon 20 May 2024 at 23:52, you wrote to Dallas Hinton:

    p.s.:
    How are you Dallas? -- or
    How are you, Dallas?
    Comma or none?
    Oh yes, the comma is needed, imo. Otherwise the first example
    could be read as: How! Are you Dallas?
    :-)
    From a grammatical standpoint I presume what he needs to know is that
    in English the comma is used with the vocative... e.g.

    Thanks. Of that, me knows now. :-)

    My initial reaction was that he had not expected to hear from you
    too.... :-))

    There happened to be an "accidental" message from Dallas with nothing but a full-quoted earlier message from me, and I chose to respond, because -- why not?


    --- Perpetual Bachelor+ 1.1.5
    * Origin: Microstuff, Inc. (2:5023/24.4222)
  • From Dallas Hinton@1:153/7715 to Gleb Hlebov on Wed May 22 14:50:36 2024
    Hi, Gleb -- on May 22 2024 at 11:44, you wrote:

    There happened to be an "accidental" message from Dallas with
    nothing but a full-quoted earlier message from me, and I chose to
    respond, because -- why not?

    I don't recall the details, but I suspect my finger slipped and I posted without realizing I'd no content! Sorry about that!


    Cheers... Dallas

    --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: The BandMaster, Vancouver, CANADA (1:153/7715)
  • From Gleb Hlebov@2:5023/24.4222 to Dallas Hinton on Fri May 24 11:47:34 2024
    Hi Dallas,

    Wed 22 May 2024 at 14:50, you wrote to me:

    There happened to be an "accidental" message from Dallas with
    nothing but a full-quoted earlier message from me, and I chose to
    respond, because -- why not?
    I don't recall the details, but I suspect my finger slipped and I
    posted without realizing I'd no content! Sorry about that!

    Nothing to be sorry about! It's just electronic massaging. :-)


    ... Consistency, Dallas, is the last refuge of the tedious
    --- A Damned Hobbyist+ 1.1.5
    * Origin: Microstuff, Inc. (2:5023/24.4222)
  • From Dallas Hinton@1:153/7715 to Gleb Hlebov on Fri May 24 10:53:10 2024
    Hi, Gleb -- on May 24 2024 at 11:47, you wrote:


    Nothing to be sorry about! It's just electronic massaging. :-)

    :-)


    Cheers... Dallas

    --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: The BandMaster, Vancouver, CANADA (1:153/7715)
  • From Alexander Koryagin@2:221/6 to Ardith Hinton on Tue Jun 4 11:00:52 2024

    Hi, Ardith Hinton!
    I read your message from 17.05.2024 00:28


    [Tom] An Oxford comma hops, skips, and jumps into a bar.

    Tom's comma is probably also a yankee's comma. ;-) No
    comma in Oxford in the list before "and".

    No, it is a genuine Oxford comma in mint condition, and I
    use it in both English and Russian. All the items of an
    enumeration shall be separated by commas lest the reader
    mistake the last two items for one combined.


    Nicely put. I use the Oxford comma for the same reason.

    I'm interested to hear that one can also employ it in
    Russian.... :-)

    The comma before "and" is just an unnecessary thing that provides anything to make the understanding more clear. With the same success you can put "and" before every comma in the list. ;-)

    Bye, Ardith!
    Alexander Koryagin
    english_tutor 2024

    ---
    * Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
  • From Alexander Koryagin@2:221/6 to Gleb Hlebov on Tue Jun 4 11:02:02 2024

    Hi, Gleb Hlebov!
    I read your message from 17.05.2024 06:23

    Sounds like a good idea!

    p.s.:
    How are you Dallas? -- or
    How are you, Dallas?

    Comma or none?

    How, are you Dallas?! ;-)


    Bye, Gleb!
    Alexander Koryagin
    english_tutor 2024

    ---
    * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
  • From Anton Shepelev@2:221/6 to Alexander Koryagin on Tue Jun 4 17:32:52 2024
    Alexander Koryagin:

    The comma before "and" is just an unnecessary thing that
    provides anything to make the understanding more clear.

    Above I wrote /why/ the Oxford comma is necessary for the
    clariy, unambiguity, and regularity of the enumeration.
    You, on the other hand, do not disclose your arguments...

    With the same success you canput "and" before every
    comma in the list. ;-)

    Don't you think it will make the list structure ugly and
    redundant?

    ---
    * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
  • From Alexander Koryagin@2:221/6 to Anton Shepelev on Fri Jun 7 16:02:08 2024

    Hi, Anton Shepelev!
    I read your message from 04.06.2024 14:32

    The comma before "and" is just an unnecessary thing that provides
    nothing to make the understanding more clear.

    Above I wrote /why/ the Oxford comma is necessary for the clariy, unambiguity, and regularity of the enumeration. You, on the other
    hand, do not disclose your arguments...

    I think that the main, core purpose to put a comma is highlighting a pause in speech. That is the comma was born. I.e. in general it is like a pause sign in musical score. We can easily imagine situation when people don't know how to write at all, but they can express themselves in a fine way. In the list a comma serves as a separator and "and" does the same role.

    With the same success you canput "and" before every comma in the
    list. ;-)

    Don't you think it will make the list structure ugly and redundant?

    Redundant mainly. You will do a thing twice. You can say even every word twice, but will it be helpful?

    Bye, Anton!
    Alexander Koryagin
    english_tutor 2024

    ---
    * Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
  • From Anton Shepelev@2:221/6 to Alexander Koryagin on Sat Jun 8 02:04:10 2024
    Alexander Koryagin:

    I think that the main, core purpose to put a comma is
    highlighting a pause in speech. That is the comma was
    born. I.e. in general it is like a pause sign in musical
    score. We can easily imagine situation when people don't
    know how to write at all, but they can express
    themselves in a fine way.

    I agree.

    In the list a comma serves as a separator and "and" does
    the same role.

    As a conjunction, `and' also serves as glue, and the Oxford
    comma is required to prevent the unintended gluing together
    of the last two items.

    ---
    * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
  • From Ed Vance@1:2320/105 to Ardith Hinton on Thu Jun 27 10:25:24 2024

    Hi, Alexander! Recently you wrote in a message to Ardith Hinton:

    It's a matter of style, not an absolute requirement, and some people recommend using it only when it's needed to avoid confusion:

    Through the window I saw John, a basketball player and a friend of
    mine.

    What is this friend's name, and is he a basketball player? I have no idea.
    I found the example in Wikipedia... I didn't personally invent it.

    I asked for coffee with a breakfast of pancakes, bacon & eggs, hot buttered toast and hash brown potatoes.

    At 5WPM I can type an added comma without having to fret about whether someone from ElseWhere will think I buttered the hash browns *after* they were cooked. For me it's easier to use the Oxford comma routinely in such a list than to go into detail about why buttering such things on the plate may not work.

    If Denis asks I'll do the latter, but other folks may not care.
    :-Q

    BTW, here's a joke Dallas found shortly before your message arrived:

    I like cooking my family and my pets.
    -- commas save lives

    I suppose you could in many cases. But as Anton says, in English it is generally considered desirable to avoid unnecessary verbiage.... [chuckle].

    --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)

    When I read Dallas's joke I thought about the phrase:
    "Love your kids but belt them in the car."

    Hmmm, should I had put a period after the ending quote mark?
    Ed
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Alexander Koryagin@2:221/6 to Ardith Hinton on Fri Jun 28 17:08:54 2024

    Hi, Ardith Hinton!
    I read your message from 27.06.2024 03:06

    The comma before "and" is just an unnecessary thing that provides
    anything to make the understanding more clear.
    It's a matter of style, not an absolute requirement, and some
    people recommend using it only when it's needed to avoid confusion:

    Through the window I saw John, a basketball player and a friend of
    mine.

    Are there three of them? ;-)
    For me, this is not a list, but a sentence with the additional information, separated with a comma from the main clause. I believe that a _good_ list must consists of homogeneous items. Nobody can prohibit you, of course, to add to the list also a puddle, car, dog and a cat, but I think it will be rather a word game.

    If we have a good list (of names, for instance) we would have:

    Through the window I saw John, Peter and Paul, who staggered out from the pub.

    What is this friend's name, and is he a basketball player? I have
    no idea. I found the example in Wikipedia... I didn't personally
    invent it.

    As we say in Russia "Be simpler and people appreciate it". ;)

    I asked for coffee with a breakfast of pancakes, bacon & eggs, hot buttered toast and hash brown potatoes.

    Yeah, no comma before potatoes. ;)

    At 5WPM I can type an added comma without having to fret about
    whether someone from ElseWhere will think I buttered the hash
    browns *after* they were cooked. For me it's easier to use the
    Oxford comma routinely in such a list than to go into detail about
    why buttering such things on the plate may not work.

    Yes, I agreed it is not important in chats. It maybe there are some doubts when you translate something. Old Everett Hertenstein taught me that the main thing is to be consistent. ;-)

    If Denis asks I'll do the latter, but other folks may not care. :-Q
    BTW, here's a joke Dallas found shortly before your message
    arrived:

    I like cooking my family and my pets. -- commas save lives

    The comma after "cooking" is a holy one, of course. ;) But not the one which could be before "my pets".

    With the same success you can put "and" before every comma in the
    list. ;-)

    I suppose you could in many cases. But as Anton says, in English it
    is generally considered desirable to avoid unnecessary verbiage.... [chuckle].

    An unnecessary comma before "and" is good mainly because nobody pays any attention to it. ;-)

    Bye, Ardith!
    Alexander Koryagin
    english_tutor 2024

    ---
    * Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
  • From Alexander Koryagin@2:221/6 to Ed Vance on Fri Jun 28 17:21:58 2024

    Hi, Ed Vance!
    I read your message from 27.06.2024 15:25

    It's a matter of style, not an absolute requirement, and some
    people recommend using it only when it's needed to avoid
    confusion: Through the window I saw John, a basketball player and
    a friend of mine. What is this friend's name, and is he a
    basketball player? I have no idea. I found the example in
    Wikipedia... I didn't personally invent it. I asked for coffee
    with a breakfast of pancakes, bacon & eggs, hot buttered toast and
    hash brown potatoes. At 5WPM I can type an added comma without
    having to fret about whether someone from ElseWhere will think I
    buttered the hash browns *after* they were cooked. For me it's
    easier to use the Oxford comma routinely in such a list than to go
    into detail about why buttering such things on the plate may not
    work. If Denis asks I'll do the latter, but other folks may not
    care.: - Q BTW, here's a joke Dallas found shortly before your
    message arrived: I like cooking my family and my pets. -- commas
    save lives I suppose you could in many cases. But as Anton says,
    in English it is generally considered desirable to avoid
    unnecessary verbiage.... [chuckle].

    When I read Dallas's joke I thought about the phrase: "Love your
    kids but belt them in the car."

    You can note, however, that when you speak such things you cannot put a comma at all. ;-)

    Hmmm, should I had put a period after the ending quote mark?

    I read that in the British English they put such a comma outside the quotation marks, but in the American English they are inside.

    Bye, Ed!
    Alexander Koryagin
    english_tutor 2024

    ---
    * Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
  • From Ardith Hinton@1:153/716 to Ed Vance on Sun Jun 30 15:10:42 2024
    Hi, Ed! Recently you wrote in a message to Ardith Hinton:

    When I read Dallas's joke I thought about the phrase:
    "Love your kids but belt them in the car."

    Oh... now there's a wonderful example of how confusing some apparently short, simple words in English may be. Just for starters, are we being told we ought to beat up on our kids or just ensure their seat belts are fastened? :-Q


    Hmmm, should I had put a period after the ending quote mark?

    AFAIK your punctuation there is correct in American & Canadian English because you were apparently quoting an entire sentence. Although I may tend to do things a bit differently at times, I am a Canadian with ex-Brit roots. :-))




    --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)
  • From Ed Vance@1:2320/105 to Ardith Hinton on Sun Jun 30 20:18:40 2024
    Hi, Ed! Recently you wrote in a message to Ardith Hinton:

    Oh... now there's a wonderful example of how confusing some apparently short, simple words in English may be. Just for starters, are we being told we ought to beat up on our kids or just ensure their seat belts are fastened? :-Q

    Either.
    It's humorous to my way of thinking.

    AFAIK your punctuation there is correct in American & Canadian English because you were apparently quoting an entire sentence. Although I may tend to do things a bit differently at times, I am a Canadian with ex-Brit roots. :-))

    I'm in Indiana, Kentucky is where I started out
    Ed

    --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Gleb Hlebov@2:5023/24.4222 to Alexander Koryagin on Mon Jul 1 08:56:38 2024
    Hi Alexander,

    Fri 28 Jun 2024 at 17:08, you wrote to Ardith Hinton:

    The comma before "and" is just an unnecessary thing that
    provides anything to make the understanding more clear.
    It's a matter of style, not an absolute requirement, and some
    people recommend using it only when it's needed to avoid
    confusion:
    Through the window I saw John, a basketball player and a friend
    of mine.
    Are there three of them? ;-)

    Now that I'm reading it I indeed see 3 different persons.

    If we have a good list (of names, for instance) we would have:
    Through the window I saw John, Peter and Paul, who staggered out from
    the pub.

    Does "who" indicate all of them, or just Paul?


    ... End of message, Alexander. Confused? Me too! :-)
    --- A Damned Hobbyist+ 1.1.5
    * Origin: Microstuff, Inc. (2:5023/24.4222)
  • From Ardith Hinton@1:153/716 to Anton Shepelev on Wed Jul 3 03:20:36 2024
    Hi, Anton! Recently you wrote in a message to Ardith Hinton:

    @MSGID: 2:221/6.0 664732c0
    @REPLY: 1:153/716.0 646b4c40
    @PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 kco 20240505
    @NOTE: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
    @CHRS: CP437 1
    @TZUTC: 0300
    @TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-03-02
    Ardith Hinton:

    I use the Oxford comma for the same reason. I'm
    interested to hear that one can also employ it in
    Russian.... :-

    And who shall stop me, even if I be the first & last person
    on Earth to use the Oxford commad in Russian?

    Not I. As a teacher & as a native speaker of English I'll cheerfully adopt a good idea from anywhere, and I bow to your wisdom WRT Russian.... :-))

    ___
    - Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
    @EEN-BY: 1/120 18/0 50/109 116/116 123/0 25 126 180 200 755 3001 135/115 @EEN-BY: 138/146 153/757 7715 154/10 10 218/840 221/1 6 360 222/2 229/426 @EEN-BY: 240/1120 250/1 25 261/38 275/100 1000 301/1 335/364 341/66 234 @EEN-BY: 342/11 450/1024 463/68 467/888 712/1321 3634/0 12 12 27 56 57 @EEN-BY: 5000/111 5001/100 5005/49 5015/42 46 5019/40 5020/715 830 846 1042 @EEN-BY: 5020/4441 5030/49 5053/51 5054/8 5058/104 5060/900 5061/133 @EEN-BY: 5075/128 5083/1 444
    @ATH: 221/6 5020/1042 3634/12 153/7715

    --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)
  • From Ed Vance@1:2320/105 to Ardith Hinton on Wed Jul 3 22:02:12 2024
    Ardith,
    In rereading messages here I noticed the BBS's Name is Wits' End .

    I was standing in line at a Church Supper, and telling a story to someone. Another person came up to me and asked if I was a member of the Wit family.
    I said, No.
    He said he thought my Name was either Half or Nit.

    What could I say?
    Ed
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to ED VANCE on Thu Jul 4 09:10:00 2024
    I was standing in line at a Church Supper, and telling a story to someone. Another person came up to me and asked if I was a member of the Wit family.
    I said, No.
    He said he thought my Name was either Half or Nit.

    I once asked a co-worker which was worse, a halfwit, dimwit, or nitwit.

    He told me I was treading on thin ice. :D

    Mike


    * SLMR 2.1a * Small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Ardith Hinton@1:153/716 to Gleb Hlebov on Fri Jul 12 20:30:38 2024
    Hi, Gleb! Recently you wrote in a message to Alexander Koryagin:

    [WRT the "Oxford" or "Harvard" comma]:
    It's a matter of style, not an absolute requirement, and
    some people recommend using it only when it's needed to
    avoid confusion:
    Through the window I saw John, a basketball player and a
    friend of mine.
    Are there three of them? ;-)
    Now that I'm reading it I indeed see 3 different persons.

    Exactly my point... I can't be sure because I don't know the author.

    If I were making introductions I might say "I'd like you to meet John, a basketball player (or a chemistry student or whatever else might interest you) and a neighbour of ours." This way you have some idea what the two of you might have in common. But if others use punctuation a bit too sparingly I have little evidence as to whether this person is simply offering further detail about John.


    If we have a good list (of names, for instance) we would have:
    Through the window I saw John, Peter and Paul, who staggered out
    from the pub.

    Does "who" indicate all of them, or just Paul?

    Beats me. I'd suggest asking Alexander, as you did... [chuckle].


    ... End of message, Alexander. Confused? Me too! :-)

    Uh-huh. So why not bother with an added comma which might help? :-))




    --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)
  • From Alexander Koryagin@2:221/6 to Ardith Hinton on Wed Jul 24 12:11:52 2024

    Hi, Ardith Hinton!
    I read your message from 12.07.2024 23:30


    If we have a good list (of names, for instance) we would have:
    Through the window I saw John, Peter and Paul, who staggered out
    from the pub.

    Does "who" indicate all of them, or just Paul?

    Beats me. I'd suggest asking Alexander, as you did... [chuckle].

    Well, remove "who" and my comma will be perfect. ;-)

    Bye, Ardith!
    Alexander Koryagin
    english_tutor 2024

    ---
    * Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)